
UI and trust refresh
A new design for one existing page, on desktop and mobile, with organised content and development notes.
Your developers are implementing an approved design. We compare two interim versions with the design and discuss agreed implementation questions.
Your enquiry is non-binding. An order is created only when you accept our quotation .




The test version lacks an error message from the design, and navigation shifts on a phone. We compare implementation with the approved design and clarify differences with your development team.
Design implementation support compares an approved design of up to five screens or states with two intermediate staging versions. One handover check and written clarification of up to ten specific implementation questions within four weeks form the agreed scope.
Not every difference matters equally. Slightly different spacing differs from a missing error message or inaccessible button. The review connects observed implementation with design intent. Development receives documented differences and decision guidance rather than taste-based judgements.
Support requires an identified development team, accessible staging and two agreed checkpoints. It includes neither code development nor production changes. A design package's normal handover and follow-up remain included there; additional reviews are separate. Already agreed frontend optimisation checks are not sold twice.
The design shows a completed form; development asks about its error state. We collect such open implementation questions against the approved design and clarify them in writing.
In staging, explanatory guidance appears below the button; the design places it before. We compare implementation with the approved version and identify which differences change interaction.
A comment is in Figma, a decision in chat and a question in a ticket. Consolidated reviews bring relevant points into one documented state.
We define which screens or states and staging version to review. The approved design is the basis. A new design is outside this comparison.
The handover check and two consolidated reviews compare the approved design with staging implementation. For each issue, we record whether the team needs to clarify a decision or correct a difference.
Within the agreed period, we answer up to ten specific implementation questions in writing. The final follow-up round concerns the result. Code changes and production-system access are excluded.

Link documented differences to development tickets. The next review can then identify which design version a decision refers to. Normal design-package handover and follow-up, and already commissioned checks, remain included in their existing scope.
Record a process we can reproduce: which page do you open, what do you click and what happens next? For operational questions, name the tools used and describe how changes reach the server.
Passwords, repository tokens and production data must not be included in the enquiry. We agree required documents and suitable access separately.
What is included, what do you need and what happens after your enquiry?
The process in detail →No. Support documents differences and clarifies agreed implementation questions. Your development team changes the code. Technical implementation by us would require a separately defined commission.
The handover and follow-up already included in a design package remain part of it. This support covers additional, expressly agreed reviews during development. Identical work is not offered again.
The package covers up to ten specific written implementation questions within the agreed four-week window and two reviews. It is not an open-ended support allowance and includes no constant availability.
Yes. Comparison needs a shared basis with up to five screens or states. While the fundamental design is still being developed, design work is the suitable service. Implementation support cannot replace a missing design decision.
Reviews are consolidated around the supplied staging environment and agreed design version. Relevant differences and questions are recorded in writing. This creates a traceable overview rather than unlimited spontaneous individual reviews throughout the project.
A question should concern an identified location or state within the agreed scope. For example, information order or intended interaction can be clarified. An entirely new function or page type is not one small follow-up question within this framework.
Four weeks from the agreed start. The two reviews and required intermediate versions are scheduled before commissioning.
An approved design with described states An identified development team and accessible staging Two agreed checkpoints within the four-week window Credentials must not be included in the enquiry. Details are agreed only after written commissioning.
One written follow-up round is included. The service scope lists the analyses, designs or technical changes covered by the package. We agree additional work with you before it begins.
What must work before the first use? Review a user journey including failure cases and record which technical questions remain afterwards.
Read the guide ↗
A new design for one existing page, on desktop and mobile, with organised content and development notes.

Up to three agreed changes to your existing frontend. We work in a test environment and document the results.