For online shops, websites and digital products
USA · USD
Analysis / Product Design · Frontend · Backend

MVP launch check

Your prototype works in the demo. We review one user journey and identify what is missing before your next launch.

US$1,249.00
Total price · one-off
VAT-exempt under section 19 of the German VAT Act
Add to selectionOne of each service per project. No automatic commitment.
SaveCompare
Does this service fit your project? Ask us ↗
  • One existing prototype and one central user journey
  • One clearly defined launch context
  • Prioritised UX, frontend and basic technical findings

Your enquiry is non-binding. An order is created only when you accept our quotation .

Service scope

Your result

  • Launch board with reasoned tasks for before and after launch
  • Review boundaries and topics not yet needed for this launch

Included

  • One existing prototype and one central user journey
  • One clearly defined launch context
  • Prioritised UX, frontend and basic technical findings
  • Launch board and one written follow-up round

Excluded

  • No general approval as secure or legally compliant
  • No assurance of unlimited scalability
  • No complete architecture review or blanket rebuild

Which projects does this service suit?

Suitable if …

  • Your AI, no-code or custom-built prototype is approaching its first users.
  • You need reasoned priorities before further investment.

Not suitable if …

  • There is no prototype or specific usage context yet.
  • You need a penetration test or production approval for a safety-critical system.
Possible overlaps with: Technology and stack review. If you enquire about these services for the same project, we check for duplicated work before commissioning. Your selection also shows a notice.
What this covers

Is my prototype ready for its first real users?

The demo works. Before first use, we check how new users navigate the central flow and what happens with missing input or technical errors. The planned launch determines which issues need resolving beforehand.

An MVP is an initial, limited product version used to test a specific assumption. We examine an existing prototype and its central user journey for the planned launch. Using AI, no-code or conventional development does not change the review boundaries.

What must be done before launch and what can wait

Starting with a small invited group has different requirements from broad publication. We compare the observed user guidance and technical baseline with the agreed project. The report identifies both obstacles and investigation limits. It does not treat every imaginable future extension as today's problem.

The result is a launch board: tasks before launch, tasks afterwards and topics not yet needed for this step. Each classification needs a reason. The board supports decisions; it is not general approval of security, legal compliance or unlimited scalability. If the core question concerns architecture, the stack review is more targeted.

Does this sound familiar?

The demo works, but actual use remains unclear

The demo works with prepared data. During first real use, input is missing or saving fails. We review the agreed core flow, including its feedback.

Your project was built with AI tools

You built a prototype with an AI tool and want to share it. We examine the existing flow and basic technical questions; what the application must do in its planned use matters.

Many tasks compete before launch

The launch list includes a new colour scheme alongside a missing error message. The board orders these tasks by their relevance to the first intended use.

How we approach it.

  1. Describe the launch context

    We define who should use the prototype for which task and which journey to review. An internal test has different conditions from a public launch.

  2. Examine the existing journey

    We follow the agreed flow and check presentation, interaction and technical foundations. We compare feedback with the visible state. Other functions remain outside the review.

  3. Hand over a launch board

    The launch board organises tasks and open decisions. Each recommendation states the observation behind it. Your team can plan subsequent work; implementation is excluded.

Hands arranging design cards and yellow notes on a white table.

After handover

Review the launch board with development and operations. Assign owners to open tasks and record which must be completed before first use. The board documents the review state; it grants no security or operational approval.

For fundamental architecture decisions, the technology and stack review is the more detailed alternative. To observe whether people understand the central journey, consider a user test. A limited launch check does not replace either perspective in full.

After your enquiry

What we clarify next.

Ask about this service ↗

Record a process we can reproduce: which page do you open, what do you click and what happens next? For operational questions, name the tools used and describe how changes reach the server.

Passwords, repository tokens and production data must not be included in the enquiry. We agree required documents and suitable access separately.

Terms used in this service

What does that mean?

MVP (Minimum Viable Product)
An initial product version for a limited use. It should complete a specific task or answer a learning question. The functions required depend on that goal.
Launch context
The planned first use: who should use the product, for which task and under which conditions. Internal testing has different requirements from a public launch.
Launch board
The overview of problems found, open decisions and next tasks. It documents the review state and helps the team organise work before launch.
Before your enquiry

Questions about the offer.

What is included, what do you need and what happens after your enquiry?

The process in detail →
Do I need a finished prototype already?

An actual, testable prototype is required. A product idea alone provides no user journey to examine. If the flow first needs designing, the user journey and prototype package is closer to that task.

Will my AI-generated code be replaced automatically?

No. The check examines the agreed user journey and basic technical questions. A rebuild is not inferred solely from how the code was created. Technical findings requiring further investigation receive specific explanations.

May I use the result as technical approval?

The result is a prioritised assessment within the described scope. It replaces neither security review, legal review nor general production approval. These boundaries are recorded visibly in the report.

Is the prototype repaired during the check?

No. The offer includes the review, launch board and one written follow-up round. Technical implementation is not automatically taken on. A limited frontend goal can be enquired about separately afterwards if a suitability review establishes an appropriate scope.

Is a complete architecture review included?

No. The launch check includes basic technical findings in the identified context. A broader examination of architecture, maintainability and deployment belongs to the stack review. Before combining services, investigation boundaries are defined to avoid commissioning the same work twice.

When does work begin?

The launch context and work window are confirmed in writing before commissioning.

Which access is needed?

A usable prototype, regardless of how it was created One identified user journey and a specific next launch step An agreed demo or read-only documents; no tokens in the enquiry form Credentials must not be included in the enquiry. Details are agreed only after written commissioning.

What happens after handover?

One written follow-up round is included. The service scope lists the analyses, designs or technical changes covered by the package. We agree additional work with you before it begins.

Read more on this topic

AI prototype before launch: what a focused check can do

What must work before the first use? Review a user journey including failure cases and record which technical questions remain afterwards.

Read the guide ↗
Before you decide

What would need to add up for you?

Additional orders, relevant enquiries or less manual work: compare your assumptions with analysis and implementation costs.

Calculate your own scenario
Related services

These may fit too.

A server room with organised racks, cables and technical equipment.
Analysis

Technology and stack review

Do you really need a rebuild? We review an application's structure and explain what to keep or change.

US$1,549.00
Total price · one-off
VAT-exempt under section 19 of the German VAT Act
View details
Add to selectionOne of each service per project. No automatic commitment.
SaveCompare
Ask an expert